Lizard beats dinosaur in two-legged race
Dinosaurs were not the first animals to run on two legs - scientists
report that a lithe lizard that lived nearly 300 million years ago beat
them in the evolutionary race.
The newly-discovered biped, Eudibamus cursoris, was a reptile unrelated to
the later dinosaurs.
Scientists unearthed a well-preserved fossil of the 26cm long creature
from a German quarry. Writing in the journal Science, they said it
appeared to be the earliest known four-legged vertebrate to walk upright.
Other bipeds are not to have emerged for at least a further 60 million
Eudibamus's skeletal structure suggests that it could run swiftly,
probably standing up on its toes, with its forelimbs swinging in a
This is similar to the posture adopted by running humans, said the US,
Canadian and German scientists.
When moving slowly, the creature probably used all four legs. But even on
four legs it would have stood out from other animals alive at the time
which had a sprawling, arms-and-legs-akimbo, gait.
Eudibamus had relatively short forelegs and long lower limbs, as well as
unusually extended feet and a long, whip-like tail - all evidence of
The reptile's tail could have served as a rudder, compensating for changes
in the animal's centre of gravity during upright motion, said the
Other signs of bipedalism could be seen from the arrangement of the
creature's hip, knee and ankle joints.
One of the researchers, Robert Reisz, from the University of Toronto in
Mississauga, Ontario, Canada, said: "This find is fascinating because it
confirms that bipedalism is an innovation that has happened several times.
It happened in some dinosaurs, and their bird descendants, and it happened
in mammals, so it must be a good idea in terms of evolution."
Why Eudibamus needed to be so speedy is something of a mystery, however.
The creature's teeth indicate that it was a plant eater, so it would not
have needed to chase prey.
The scientists think it probably learned to run on two legs in order to
sprint away from predators.
Recent excavations at the quarry near the village of Tambach-Dietharz in
Thuringia, central Germany, have uncovered a fossil of a small meat-eater
that may have preyed on Eudibamus.
Friday 3rd November 2000.
Archive date: 11-11-00
Supplied by DK
To HiddenMysteries Internet Book Store
Search this Reptilian Agenda Website
HiddenMysteries and/or the donor of this material may or may not agree with all the data or conclusions of this data.
It is presented here 'as is' for your benefit and research. Material for these pages are sent from around the world.
Reptilian Agenda Website is a publication of TGS Services
Please direct all correspondence to
TGS HiddenMysteries, c/o TGS Services,
22241 Pinedale Lane, Frankston, Texas, 75763
All Content © HiddenMysteries - TGS (1998-2005)
HiddenMysteries.com Internet Store ~ HiddenMysteries Information Central
Texas National Press ~ TGS Publishers Dealers Site
All Rights Reserved
Please send bug reports to firstname.lastname@example.org
FAIR USE NOTICE. This site may at times contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc.. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml
United States Code: Title 17, Section 107 http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/unframed/17/107.shtml
Notwithstanding the provisions of sections 106 and 106A, the fair use of a copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in copies or phonorecords or by any other means specified by that section, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright. In determining whether the use made of a work in any particular case is a fair use the factors to be considered shall include - (1) the purpose and character of the use, including whether such use is of a commercial nature or is for nonprofit educational purposes; (2) the nature of the copyrighted work; (3) the amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole; and (4) the effect of the use upon the potential market for or value of the copyrighted work. The fact that a work is unpublished shall not itself bar a finding of fair use if such finding is made upon consideration of all the above factors.