FIRST LIZARD MAN SPOTTER PASSES POLYGRAPH
Archive file# r110199f
donated by James Vandale
FIRST LIZARD MAN SPOTTER PASSES POLYGRAPH
Published: Saturday, September 3, 1988
Section: METRO/REGION - Page: 1C
By JAN TUTEN, Camden Bureau
The Lizard Man
The 17-year-old youth who created an international Lizard Man frenzy has passed
a private polygraph test about his encounter with the 7-foot creature, his
Polygraph experts say that means Davis believes he saw what he said he saw -- a
red-eyed greenish creature that chased him on a rural county road. Others put as
much stock in polygraphs as they do Lizard Men.
Lee County Sheriff Liston Truesdale said another "eyewitness" claims in a sworn
statement to have crossed paths with the creature last fall. Yet another man
reported seeing a "brownish creature about 8 feet tall" eight days ago.
Truesdale's office investigated, and the sheriff said he will administer a
polygraph test to the man, a colonel living in Lee County, next week.
who reports seeing something will be given a polygraph test," Truesdale said.
Sumter Police Capt. Earl Berry administered Davis' polygraph Aug. 18 at the
Sumter City-County Law Enforcement Center.
The test was paid for by Southern Marketing Inc., a company formed by two Sumter
men to arrange personal appearances for Davis, and Berry said he could not
release the results. Davis said his father wanted him to undergo the exam "to
prove I'm telling the truth."
Rick Welch, a former Sumter police detective and a
partner with Randy Galloway in Southern Marketing, said he and Galloway arranged
to have the test done "to satisfy our minds. Some in the media are saying he
might be on drugs or strung out on drugs." " What put the icing on the cake was
one weekend we had some young boys picking on him, so we wanted to set the
Welch said the questions Davis correctly answered included: "Was the creature
that attacked your car green and black? Were you drinking or smoking drugs? Were
you really driving 35 mph when a creature jumped on your car? Did it occur
immediately following your changing a flat tire?"
While police rely on polygraph exams as an investigative tool -- often eliciting
a confession -- results are rarely allowed in court because of contentions that
polygraph testing is not an exact science.
"We've long been opposed to them
because of their unreliability and invasiveness. They're probably as reliable as
the Lizard Man story itself," said Charles Taylor, director of the Carolina
Alliance for Fair Employment.
About 10 percent of those undergoing polygraph exams -- including people who
suffer from mental illnesses like psychosis, schizophrenia or paranoia -- would
not be good polygraph subjects and probably would provide inconclusive results,
veteran examiner Frank Faulk said. "If a person really believes he didn't commit
a crime or was so drunk he doesn't remember it, he could possibly pass it," said
Faulk, who retired in 1978 after 27 years as the State Law Enforcement
Division's chief polygraph examiner.
Truesdale said he had been looking for another Browntown resident who told a
deputy in June he saw a creature in the swamp last fall. The deputy didn't put
much stock in the story until Davis made his claim. "What adds credibility to
his story is that we knew about him before we knew about Chris Davis," the
sheriff said. "We've been looking for him but couldn't find him."
In an Aug. 13 statement, George Holloman Jr., a 31-year-old construction worker,
said he had ridden a bike to a flowing spring about 12:30 a.m. one day last
fall. Holloman drank some water, lit a cigarette, turned around and "saw it
across the road," Truesdale said.
"What he saw, he thought, was a dead tree that had been struck by lightning.
Then it moved." The sheriff said Holloman described it as between 7 and 8 feet
tall, and it "stood up like a man," Truesdale said. "A car passed by, and that's
when he saw the eyes. He said they glowed when the car passed." The creature
went back in the swamp after the car passed, Holloman told the sheriff. "He
thought it was a 'hant,' " what rural folks call ghosts, the sheriff said.
Truesdale said Holloman told no one of the encounter. "When he did tell his
family, his brother thought he was going fool."
To HiddenMysteries Internet Book Store
Search this Reptilian Agenda Website
HiddenMysteries and/or the donor of this material may or may not agree with all the data or conclusions of this data.
It is presented here 'as is' for your benefit and research. Material for these pages are sent from around the world.
Reptilian Agenda Website is a publication of TGS Services
Please direct all correspondence to
TGS HiddenMysteries, c/o TGS Services,
22241 Pinedale Lane, Frankston, Texas, 75763
All Content © HiddenMysteries - TGS (1998-2005)
HiddenMysteries.com Internet Store ~ HiddenMysteries Information Central
Texas National Press ~ TGS Publishers Dealers Site
All Rights Reserved
Please send bug reports to firstname.lastname@example.org
FAIR USE NOTICE. This site may at times contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc.. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml
United States Code: Title 17, Section 107 http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/unframed/17/107.shtml
Notwithstanding the provisions of sections 106 and 106A, the fair use of a copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in copies or phonorecords or by any other means specified by that section, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright. In determining whether the use made of a work in any particular case is a fair use the factors to be considered shall include - (1) the purpose and character of the use, including whether such use is of a commercial nature or is for nonprofit educational purposes; (2) the nature of the copyrighted work; (3) the amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole; and (4) the effect of the use upon the potential market for or value of the copyrighted work. The fact that a work is unpublished shall not itself bar a finding of fair use if such finding is made upon consideration of all the above factors.