archived 11-09-00
Archive file# e110900a
Contributed by S. R.
www.TheMarsRecords.com

The Woman of Reptilian Resource


Weird comment here on Hillary:
New York Post Online

He says:
"this woman of reptilian resource"

If you look reptilian up in a good dictionary, the only meanings of "reptilian" are:

    1. Of, or pertaining to reptiles
    2. Resembling or characteristic of a reptile
    3. Repulsive, contemptible, or devious

Strange!!!
No. 3 doesn't really fit.
Perhaps he really meant No. 2?

S.R.

SHE'S ALREADY EYEING A
WHITE HOUSE RUN

Thursday,November 9,2000
By STEVE DUNLEAVY

IN THE madness of monstrous political mayhem, we find ourselves more confused than a matador facing a cow.

But there is one given, more certain than anything in this season of idiocy, and it is simply this:

The precise moment Hillary Rodham Clinton won the Senate race, she launched her campaign to run for the White House.

From the summer of 1999, when this woman of reptilian resource announced her candidacy, she was asked constantly one question:

Is this a preliminary fight for the main event to become the first female president of this great country, right now under strain?

Pledge after pledge, written by reporters, recorded on the tube, the response was:

"I have no ambition for higher office. I will serve the full six years, to serve New York."

This from a woman who wouldn't serve coffee if she owned Colombia.

"As far back as 1993, there were printed signs all over her office, proclaiming 'In The White House, Hillary 1996.' "

These are the solemn words of Tom Fitton, chairman of Judicial Watch, who has tracked Hillary's careless disregard for the truth over the years, like a bloodhound.

Tom, together with general counsel Larry Klayman, represent Sheryl Hall, a computer whiz on Hillary's staff, who refused to commit what she claims was a criminal act.

Sheryl and Judicial Watch are suing Hillary Clinton for emotionally torturing her after she refused to stack a database of illegally obtained files for Hillary's campaign funding. "It was a mistake," said Hillary's spokesman Howard Wolfson.

Yeah, and I regularly shave with a butcher knife. Hillary, like her husband, committed a freakin' crime.

source and full story at:
New York Post Online



To HiddenMysteries Internet Book Store



Search Query
Search this Reptilian Agenda Website



HiddenMysteries and/or the donor of this material may or may not agree with all the data or conclusions of this data.
It is presented here 'as is' for your benefit and research. Material for these pages are sent from around the world. Reptilian Agenda Website is a publication of TGS Services
Please direct all correspondence to
TGS HiddenMysteries, c/o TGS Services,
22241 Pinedale Lane, Frankston, Texas, 75763


All Content © HiddenMysteries - TGS (1998-2005)
HiddenMysteries.com Internet Store ~ HiddenMysteries Information Central
Texas National Press ~ TGS Publishers Dealers Site

All Rights Reserved

Please send bug reports to info@hiddenmysteries.org

FAIR USE NOTICE. This site may at times contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc.. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml

United States Code: Title 17, Section 107 http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/unframed/17/107.shtml Notwithstanding the provisions of sections 106 and 106A, the fair use of a copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in copies or phonorecords or by any other means specified by that section, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright. In determining whether the use made of a work in any particular case is a fair use the factors to be considered shall include - (1) the purpose and character of the use, including whether such use is of a commercial nature or is for nonprofit educational purposes; (2) the nature of the copyrighted work; (3) the amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole; and (4) the effect of the use upon the potential market for or value of the copyrighted work. The fact that a work is unpublished shall not itself bar a finding of fair use if such finding is made upon consideration of all the above factors.